This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Elon Musk and POTUS Candidate Andrew Yang Discuss A.I.'s Dangers on Twitter

It was a fascinating, and not exactly surprising, meeting of the minds.

In an interaction on Wednesday that can only be described as “a lot of tweet,” 2020 long-shot presidential hopeful Andrew Yang, who has made mitigating the consequences of automation-related job displacement the focal point of his campaign, and Elon Musk exchanged ideas on Twitter about our soon-to-be-reality with A.I. technology.

The first tweet, posted by Yang on Wednesday evening, detailed a recent competition held in China that pitted an A.I. system, BioMind, against radiologists in a brain-tumor-diagnosing race. In both rounds, the A.I. system beat trained human professionals in both speed and accuracy. If you just thought, “Oh, yikes,” then you and Yang are very much on the same page.

Sign up for the “Musk Reads” newsletter to get the latest news on SpaceX, Tesla, and more. Sign up for free here.

“This could do incredible good but is another example of areas in which new technology is capable of beating humans,” Yang wrote. “We have to evolve quickly.”

Musk, whose company SpaceX was gearing up for a historic rocket launch, responded almost immediately with what he says are the three likeliest outcomes for humans in an A.I.-led future: “Symbiosis, irrelevance (hopefully blissful) or doom.”

Article continues below

Elon Musk is pushing the boundaries of where we can go and what we can do. Don't miss a beat by signing up for Musk Reads, our weekly newsletter about all things SpaceX, Tesla, and The Boring Company.
Subscribe:
Okay, my dude, none of these options sound particularly great for humans. 

This is hardly the first time Yang has expressed concern about the unintended consequences of increasingly rapid A.I. advancements. Since the earliest throes of his campaign, the upstate New York-native has run on a platform of universal basic income, which his campaign calls the Freedom Dividend. #HumanityFirst has continued to be a rallying cry for Yang as he continues to shore up support from cities facing waves of production job losses.

Meanwhile, Musk, whose SpaceX Falcon Heavy, the world’s most powerful rocket, is sent to launch for a second time on April 11, doesn’t seem to be referring to a specific cybernetic interface project. Rather, it’s the idea that a communication platform between A.I. and humans needs to exist, and needs to exist soon.

Though the “doom” statement in particular is, er, a bit ominous, it’s actually a pretty moderate statement for Musk, at least as far as A.I. is concerned. At SXSW 2018, Musk turned heads by saying that being at the cutting edge of A.I. “scares the hell out of me.”

“The rate of improvement is exponential,” he said. “Mark my words: A.I. is far more dangerous than nukes.”

Musk called for greater regulation of A.I. in a 2017 meeting with the National Governors Association; co-signed a letter to the UN urging a ban on killer robots; and helped fund OpenAI, a non-profit organization devoted to investigating how to ensure that A.I. benefits humanity.

It’s a fascinating, if not entirely unsurprising, meeting of the minds. Yang’s surprising rise in opinion polls, as well as his unlikely early qualification for the Democratic National Committee’s debates this summer were credited in no small part to the internet savvy Yang Gang, a coterie of meme-making online supporters. And, of course, we all know Musk loves a good meme. But there’s more to the overlap between the two audiences. Both men made widely viewed appearances on Joe Rogan’s podcast — Musk last September and Yang just a few months ago — and Musk himself has also suggested in the past that he favors UBI.

It would be very surprising if this was the final interaction between the two, assuming Yang’s star continues to rise. 

'Game of Thrones' Finale Easter Eggs May Tease the Return of the Night King

How the show's final shot comes full circle with its first.

The Game of Thrones finale might have ended on a slightly unsatisfactory note, but the final shot actually teased a possible future beyond Season 8 by referencing the HBO show’s very first episode. An Easter egg spotted in Game of Thrones Season 8, Episode 6 brings the series full circle in a very interesting way.

Isle of Naath and West of Westeros Tease 'Game of Thrones' Finale Spinoffs

Here's what these two locations mean for the post-GoT story.

Game of Thrones aired its final episode Sunday night, but HBO is already planning at least three spinoff shows. We know one is a prequel, but the other two could pick up where Season 8, Episode 6 left off. On that note, the series finale may have dropped two major clues about where this story is headed next: Where is the Isle of Naath? What’s west of Westeros? And could either of these locations reveal what comes after the Game of Thrones finale? Here’s what you need to know.

Unpacking the New Politics of Westeros in the 'Game of Thrones' Finale

What do you even call this form of government?

The war for the Iron Throne on Game of Thrones is finally over now that the series finale aired Sunday night, and it’s full of plenty grim surprises and some radical changes for Westeros. Perhaps the most surprising twist of all involves some revolutionary new Westerosi politics. Here’s what the ending of Game of Thrones means for the future of the Seven Kingdoms.

'Westworld' Season 3 Trailer Pays Homage to a Famous NYC Photo

Shortly after melting the Iron Throne in the series finale of Game of Thrones, HBO prepared its audience to re-enter the complicated world of Westworld. The first trailer for Season 3, premiering in 2020, takes viewers out of the parks and into the “real” world. One moment in the trailer cements this fact by paying homage to a now iconic photograph, “Lunch Atop a Skyscraper”.

Why the Benioff and Weiss Star Wars Movies Will Transcend ‘Game of Thrones’

 As the most popular TV show of the 21st century burns to the ground, the future of the Force is stronger than ever.

If you clicked on this article because you saw the proclamation that David Benioff and D.B Weiss will make a Star Wars movie that is better than Game of Thrones, there’s a chance you’ve already said, out loud, in the sarcastic style of Princess Leia: “That doesn’t sound too hard.” For better or for worse, the spring of 2019 is Game of Thrones backlash season, meaning the fantasy kings of the past decade are suddenly this year’s creative hacks. Now that a huge portion of the population seems ready to feed Benioff and Weiss to the dragons, what does it mean for the Star Wars movie of 2022? Will it suck because Benioff and Weiss are “actually” bad writers?