Russia published a picture of a nuclear missile known as Satan 2 on Tuesday that spurred new concerns about the country’s work on a modern nuclear weapon, but how much should we really worry about the missile with the scary name? Here’s what we know — or at least think we know — about this nuclear demon.

Work on Satan 2 has been public since 2013; development began in 2009. But this new image (below) is the first glimpse the world has gotten at a device that is said to be able to destroy an area as large as Texas.

The missile’s formal name is the RS-28 Sarmat. It’s an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) that is said to be able to reach the coasts of the United States. It can carry a thermonuclear payload or more conventional warheads that leave room for a plethora of anti-detection tools.

Here's what Satan 2 looks like.
Here's what Satan 2 looks like.

ICBMs are made to travel long distances in a short amount of time. The land-based “Minuteman” system, developed by the United States, has a range of 13,000 kilometers (almost 8,100 miles) — that’s much larger than Satan 2’s reported 6,000-mile range. But Satan 2 has the benefit of a larger payload and more modern control systems.

Satan 2 is a followup to the R-36M that debuted in the 1970s. That missile was also capable of delivering nuclear warheads, though the size of the payload changed depending on which variation of the R-36M was being used. Either way, though, the R-36M was larger than the “Peacekeeper” missiles that were developed by the United States.

The work on Satan 2 is alarming, but there’s little reason to worry about Russia nuking the United States. [Satan 2 is unlikely to nuke Texas, though]((https://www.inverse.com/article/15826-why-you-shouldn-t-be-worried-about-russia-s-satan-2-missile-that-can-destroy-texas): It can’t travel that distance and carry a nuclear payload — it’s one or the other.

Satan 2 also seems scary because so much of the world’s nuclear arsenal hasn’t been meaningfully updated in a long while. The United States continues to use a floppy disk system for its nukes, for example, but that doesn’t mean upgrading to a modern control mechanism would spell doom for Russia.

Russia’s efforts are worth taking more seriously than, say, North Korea’s. But if it weren’t for the fear-inspiring name (Satan 2 is much scarier than Peacekeeper), this missile probably wouldn’t be getting so much attention. It’s powerful, terrifying, and unlikely to ever be used.


Hello! You've made it to the end of the article. Nice. Here's a related video you might like: "Cybersecurity Under Donald Trump"