This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Trump's War on the EPA Is Right-Wing Canadian Fan Fic

Stephen Harper hated regulation too and that did not end well.

President Donald Trump has ordered the Environmental Protection Agency to put its contract and grant programs on indefinite hold and instructed staff not to speak publicly about the move, according to several news reports.

These EPA contracts pay for research, environmental remediation, and monitoring, representing core operations of the agency. The EPA awarded about $11 billion in contracts and grants in 2013. It’s unclear the extent to which ongoing contracts will be impacted, or how long the freeze will last. Trump’s pick to lead the EPA, Scott Pruitt, has yet to be confirmed by the Senate.

The move may seem unprecedented, but if American onlookers want to glimpse the future of environmental science under Trump, they can look north to Canada, which has only just emerged from a scientific Dark Age of its own.

Back in 2013, Canadian scientists gathered on the lawn of Parliament Hill, many holding signs and dressed in lab coats, to protest the actions of then-Prime Minister Stephen Harper to defund science and silence federal scientists. It was an odd sight — Canadian scientists as a group are not known for causing a ruckus. But tensions, simmering for years, had boiled over.

It’s hard to overstate the real impact the Harper government had on Canadian science: Thousands of jobs were cut; libraries were shuttered, haphazardly and with little notice; an unknown volume of archival data was lost forever. Scientists could no longer speak to the media about their research. Journalists received responses in the form of pre-approved talking points emailed through communications officials — if they got any at all.

Article continues below

Our Science and Innovation teams bring you all of today’s news that’s helping shape your tomorrow.
Sign up for our newsletter:

That last point — on the muzzling of scientists and public officials — resonates strongly in America today. EPA staff have been notified that no public communications will be permitted: no news releases, no social media, and no speaking with journalists without careful vetting ahead of time. A similar gag order has been issued to scientists and staff with the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Agricultural Research Service. The EPA’s most recent news release, issued Friday, notified residents of the Yakama Nation in Washington State of an ongoing outdoor fire ban due to low air quality in the area. This is the sort of information that will no longer be released to the public.

What happens if oil spills in inland federal waters, the jurisdiction of the EPA? How will officials get the word out to the public, given that they’ve been barred from all external communication? Will they have the authority required to immediately make orders for emergency clean-up action, given that this will almost certainly require hiring outside contractors? Who, exactly, will be in charge?

The EPA and the USDA — which also saw its research grant funding frozen — did not respond to requests for comment on this story.

It wouldn’t be entirely accurate to suggest that the Trump administration has declared a war on science this week. These actions are not about attacking science in general, but clearly separating friend from foe and silencing the latter. It’s not scientists in general that worry about Trump and his leadership, only those who suggest that unbridled industrial capitalism has unintended negative consequences for human and environmental health.

That’s why the Trump administration needed the list of Department of Energy staff who had attended climate change meetings — it’s a crude measure for those in the agency who might not fully back Trump’s goals of unrestrained fossil fuel industry expansion.

While Canadian scientists were caught somewhat off guard by the insidious creep of scientific suffocation, American scientists were not, and won’t be. Since Trump’s election in November, the alarm bells have been ringing. American scientists are working with Canadian counterparts and others to back up key databases, particularly on climate change.

Trump’s power to do real harm is enormous, but resistance is possible. The DOE successfully rejected Trump’s request for names of staff who had worked on climate change issues — though, admittedly, he was not yet president at the time.

Just days into his administration, Trump has already pushed the bar well past the suppression of data and evidence and into the promotion of verifiably false “alternative facts.” This is dangerous territory, and Americans will have to look farther afield than Canada to understand how this tactic will play out.

“Obvious lies serve a purpose for an administration,” tweeted Russian dissident and chess grandmaster Garry Kasparov on Saturday. “They watch who challenges them and who loyally repeats them. The people must watch, too.”

Media via Getty Images / Pool

The Incredible Science Behind This Self-Warming, Self-Cooling Bed

Eight Sleep’s new bed will make tossing and turning a thing of the past.

Filed Under Data

Sleep tracking can unquestionably help you establish better habits which allow for a more restful night’s sleep. By keeping track of the nights that you toss and turn, you can identify potential explanations for your sub-optimal slumber. Maybe it’s the time of week that’s got you anxious. Maybe it was the cheeseburger you had for lunch. Paying attention is just the start, though.

Mars One Is a "Money Grab" Where Everyone Loses

If you’re looking for an escape, this definitely isn’t it. 

The space tourism startup Mars One has been called many things over the years, some more flattering than others. Though it’s had the opportunity to fold many times, and in spite of claims it’s scamming its own customers, the project with the stated goal of sending people to Mars has come up with bewildering new techniques to keep its charade afloat.

The 'Stoned Ape' Theory Might Explain Our Extraordinary Evolution

A scientist resurfaces a psychedelic retelling of human evolution.

Imagine Homo erectus, a now-extinct species of hominids that stood upright and became the first of our ancestors to move beyond a single continent. Around two million years ago, these hominids, some of whom eventually evolved into Homo sapiens, began to expand their range beyond Africa, moving into Asia and Europe. Along the way, they tracked animals, encountered dung, and discovered new plants.

Survey Reveals the Top 10 Relationship Deal Breakers in America

If you could build the perfect relationship, what would it look like? 

By Gary W. Lewandowski Jr., The Conversation
Filed Under Data & Relationships

There’s an old saying, “When you reach the end of your rope, tie a knot in it and hang on.” In other words, before you give up, take matters into your own hands and try a little harder.

As a psychology researcher, I believe this adage applies to relationships, too. Before you let go, look for the “knots” that might save you from accidentally letting a great relationship slip from your grasp. Relationship science suggests that the problem is that people tend to overemphasize the negative and underappreciate the positive when looking at their romantic partners.

Millions of Perfectly Synchronized Starlings Are Flying for Their Survival

Scientists are starting to understand the point of this phenomenon.

By A. Jamie Wood and Colin Beale, The Conversation
Filed Under Biology

Watching starling murmurations as the birds swoop, dive, and wheel through the sky is one of the great pleasures of a dusky winter’s evening. From Naples to Newcastle, these flocks of agile birds are all doing the same incredible acrobatic display, moving in perfect synchrony. But how do they do it? Why don’t they crash? And what is the point?