It’s fair to say math is not everyone’s favorite subject. In fact, for many people, the feelings of tension and anxiety that arise when trying to solve a mathematical problem can be all-consuming. This is known as math anxiety — and this feeling of being a failure at math can affect people’s self-worth for years to come.
For those who suffer from math anxiety, it can be difficult to shift from a mindset of failure to a more positive outlook when it comes to dealing with numbers. This is why, for many people, math anxiety can become a lifelong issue.
But research shows that if teachers tackle math anxiety in the classroom and encourage children to try to approach a problem in a different way — by shifting their mindset — this can be an empowering experience. This is especially the case for pupils from a disadvantaged background.
US psychology professor, Carol Dweck, came up with the idea of “mindset theory.” Dweck realized that people can often be categorized into two groups, those who believe they are bad at something and cannot change, and those who believe their abilities can grow and improve.
This formed the basis of her mindset theory, which states that some people have a “fixed mindset,” meaning they believe their ability to be set in stone and unable to be improved. Other people have a “growth mindset,” meaning they believe their ability can change and improve over time with effort and practice.
Jo Boaler, the British education author and professor of mathematics education, applied mindset theory to mathematics, subsequently naming her recommendations “mathematical mindsets.”
She has used this theory to encourage learners to develop a growth mindset in the context of mathematics. The idea is that the problems themselves can help to promote a growth mindset in pupils — without them having to think about their mindset intentionally.
New Ways of Thinking
But while this all sounds well and good, one of the issues with mindset theory is that it is often presented in terms of brain plasticity or the brain’s ability to grow. This has lead to complaints about a shortage of neurological evidence supporting mindset theory. Our latest research aimed to address this lack of neurological research.
Generally speaking, for every problem in mathematics, there is more than one way to solve it. If someone asks you what three multiplied by four is, you can calculate the answer either as 4+4+4 or as 3+3+3+3, depending on your preference. But if you have not developed sufficient mathematical maturity or have math anxiety, it can prevent you from seeing multiple ways of solving problems. But our new study shows that a “growth mindset” can make math anxiety a thing of the past.
We measured participants’ motivation to solve mathematical problems by asking about motivation both before and after each problem was presented. We also measured participants’ brain activity, specifically looking at areas associated with motivation, while they solved each problem. This was done using an electroencephalogram (EEG) which records patterns of activation across the brain.
In our research, we phrased questions in different ways to assess how question structure may affect both our participants’ ability to answer the questions and their motivation while tackling math problems.
Each question appeared in two formats: one of typical mathematical teaching and another adhering to the recommendations of mathematical mindset theory. Both questions asked essentially the same question and had the same answer, like in the following simplified example:
“Find the number which is the sum of 20,000 and 30,000 divided by two” (a typical mathematical problem) and “Find the midpoint number between 20,000 and 30,000” (an example of a mathematical mindset problem).
Our study provides two important findings.
The first is that participants’ motivation was greater when solving mathematical mindset versions of problems compared to the standard versions — as measured by their brain response when solving the problems. It is assumed this is because the mathematical mindset wording encourages students to treat numbers as points in the space and manipulate spatial constructions.
The second is that participants’ subjective reports of motivation were significantly decreased after attempting the more standard math questions.
Our research is immediately actionable in that it shows how opening up problems so that there are multiple methods to solving them, or adding a visual component, allows learning to become an empowering experience for all students.
So for people with math anxiety, you will be relieved to know that you are not innately “bad” at math and your ability is not fixed. It is actually just a bad habit you have developed due to bad teaching. And the good news is, it can be reverted.