Science

NASA: We Didn't Change Your Zodiac Sign, Astrology Isn't Real

"We didn’t change any zodiac signs. We just did the math."

Updated: 
Originally Published: 
Hand holding a crystal ball with a mesmerizing swirl of cosmic colors inside, creating a portal-like...
Yana Iskayeva/Moment/Getty Images

We’ll just put it out there: There are actually 13 astrological signs instead of 12. This means that 86 percent of all people were actually born under a different sign. This is old news, but Capricorns, Sagittarii, and everyone in between still are flipping out and incorrectly blaming NASA. The space agency would like everyone to know that they didn’t actually change anything.

NASA’s reasoning? Astrology isn’t real in the first place. “Did you recently hear that NASA changed the zodiac signs? Nope, we definitely didn’t,” the agency posted Tuesday on its Tumblr, which feels like the appropriate medium.

“Here at NASA, we study astronomy, not astrology,” the post — which is a masterclass on shade — continues. “We didn’t change any zodiac signs, we just did the math.” NASA then proceeds to explain that the former is a science that intelligent people devote their lives to, and the later is hooey.

“We didn’t change any zodiac signs, we just did the math.”

“Astrology is something else,” NASA says. “It’s not science. No one has shown that astrology can be used to predict the future or describe what people are like based on their birth dates.”

NASA goes on to explain what happened. Some 3,000 years ago, the ancient Babylonians divided the Zodiac into an even 12 pieces. Each “slice” was represented by a constellation that the sun would appear to pass through at differing points of the year as the Earth orbited around the sun.

The Babylonians, NASA points out, cheated a bit. The sun didn’t actually pass through each constellation for a consistent, month-long timespan. It varied immensely. On top of that, the Babylonians knew there was a thirteenth constellation, Ophiuchus, but that wouldn’t have lined up with their calendar, so they just didn’t include it. Also, the sky has shifted because Earth’s axis has changed a bit over the course of 3,000 years.

To summarize, all NASA said it did was to show what the Zodiac really looks like. It didn’t change Zodiac signs because, honestly, NASA doesn’t care about whether you’re a Leo or a Virgo.

But … you know, if it were real, here’s what sign you’d be under with the current 13-sign Zodiac chart. NASA added the thirteenth sign, Ophiuchus, and actually noted the dates when the sun actually passes through each sign, rather than dividing them up evenly and arbitrarily. On its website, NASA explains how, since the axis of the Earth has tilted over the course of 3,000 years, the dates are slightly different than they were back then, since the path of the sun through the constellations has changed. It’s unlikely that there will be another axis tilt large enough to change the dates in our lifetimes, so the chart below is what you’re stuck with.

The Real Zodiac Chart, According To NASA

Capricorn: January 20 - February 16

Aquarius: February 16 - March 11

Pisces: March 11 - April 18

Aries: April 18 - May 13

Taurus: May 13 - June 21

Gemini: June 21- July 20

Cancer: July 20 - August 10

Leo: August 10 - September 16

Virgo: September 16 - October 30

Libra: October 30 - November 23

Scorpio: November 23 - 29

Ophiuchus: November 29 - December 17

Sagittarius: December 17 - January 20

Poor Scorpios.

This article was originally published on

Related Tags