Filed Under NSFA & NSFG

The amount of sex couples have doesn’t necessarily translate to marital or personal bliss, and as a new study suggests, less-frequent sex might make couples happier.

The study, published in Social Psychology and Personality Science, debunks the long-cherished, pop-culture-reinforced notion that more sex equates to more happiness.

“For people in relationships, sexual frequency is no longer significantly associated with well-being at a frequency greater than once a week,” wrote the researchers, led by Amy Muise, of the University of Toronto, Mississauga.

Article continues below

Muise and her colleagues found through three separate surveys that most Americans consider five rounds of sexual activity a month to be sufficient, and that the relationship between happiness and sex had more of a curvilinear tinge to it, as opposed to a strictly linear composition. People who were having sex less than once a month were less happy than those having sex once a week, but the overall returns for happiness diminished as frequency increased.

One survey contained answers from 25,000 respondents compiled throughout 1989 to 2012. Nearly all the data remained static across gender, race, and ethnicity.

Not examined in-depth was how these findings would hold for people outside of relationships. “Looking at when and for whom having more frequent sex when single is beneficial is another area ripe for future research,” Muise told The Guardian.

Muise and her team aren’t the first scientists to dampen the expectation that lots of sex leads to a better life. Researchers at Carnegie Mellon University have done the same, publishing a similar study last July, in which two survey groups were split up and asked to alter their respective sex lives. The first group was asked to have more sex, while the second didn’t change their sexual routines.

The first group reported far less happiness than the second.

Photos via .J.K. Califf/Flickr Creative Commons

On Monday, scientists revealed the first images of a human inside the world’s newest total body scanner, called EXPLORER. The name is fitting because this scanner really leaves absolutely nothing to the imagination, tracking the way drugs and disease progress through every nook and cranny in the body.

Designed by biomedical engineering professor Simon Cherry, Ph.D., and biophysicist Ramsey Badawi, Ph.D. at University of California, Davis, this scanner produces images that look like a hybrid between a PET scan (which is often used to find tumors) and an X-ray, all in ghostly black and white. But what’s interesting about EXPLORER, which will be officially unveiled at the Radiological Society of North America meeting on November 24th, isn’t that it produces detailed images of tissues or bones. Cherry tells Inverse that it can also create 3D movies showing where certain drugs may end up in the body.

Dress shirts can cost so much more than you think. Not just in retail price, but when it comes to laundering, comfort and general ease of wear, the trade-off with traditional dress shirts is that you look the part, but you may never quite feel it. Mizzen+Main has arrived on the scene to disrupt your discomfort with a new kind of dress shirt.

Since the beginning of humanity, there’s been testosterone, one of our most famous hormones. But this year, we learned a lot about T: how it affects what kind of products we buy and how it’s decreasing in young men. Back in June, the authors of a paper in Nature Ecology and Evolution handed down a sobering revelation about testosterone: Where a guy grows up can impact how much his body produces for the rest of his life.

When Cool Teens started vaping weed at increasingly higher rates, they inadvertently exposed a scientific grey area: Is there actually a difference between smoking weed and vaping it? A study published Friday in JAMA Network Open has an answer, though it may not be that comforting to vape enthusiasts.

This small study, overseen by Johns Hopkins School of Medicine’s Ryan Vandrey, Ph.D., an associate professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences, is really all about the delivery of THC — the psychoactive compound in weed. The various ways THC gets into the body produces effects on radically different timescales (as anyone who’s experienced edibles can attest).

In 2016, as finals approached at Baylor University, sleep scientist Michael Scullin, Ph.D., began to worry that his students were planning to pull all-nighters to pass his final exam — that is, unless he found a way to stop them. Armed with smartwatches and a promise of extra credit, he sought out to see if he could change their behavior. Now, after publishing his results in the journal Teaching Psychology, he’s hoping other colleges will do the same.