This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Harvard Study on Sugary Drinks and Early Death May Spell the End of Soda

Soda, sports drinks, and fruit drinks are all under fire.

It’s no secret that both sugar-sweetened and artificially sweetened sodas are linked to diabetes and obesity, but new research published Monday could finally close the coffin on soda, showing that drinking sugary sodas can actually shorten your life.

In a study published in the American Heart Association journal Circulation, Harvard public health researchers show evidence that people who drink two or more sugar-sweetened beverages a day — this includes sodas, sports drinks, and fruit drinks sweetened with sugar, high-fructose corn syrup, or fruit concentrates — have significantly higher chances of dying early compared to people who drank less than one a month.

The paper used data on over 100,000 men and women over roughly 30 years to show that men who drank at least two sodas a day had a 29 percent higher risk of death compared to people who drank less than one soda a month. Women who drank at least two sodas a day had a 63 percent higher risk of death. For women who drank two or more sodas a day, there was also a 34 percent higher risk of dying from breast cancer. Overall, men and women who drank two or more sodas a day were 31 percent more likely to die from cardiovascular disease and 18 percent more likely to die of cancer.

Is our romance with soda coming to an end?

Drinking more than one soda a month but less than two sodas a day was healthier, though it was still risky. The researchers behind the new study found that the risk increased as the amount of sugary sodas increased —an effect they describe as “a graded association with dose.” Together, these results illustrate that while drinking less soda is always a good move, the healthiest choice is to straight-up avoid consuming the 77 grams of sugar found in a 20-ounce Mountain Dew.

Article continues below

Beat the "Sunday Scaries" with a weekly newsletter that mixes soothing science and relatable advice to get your mind & body ready for the week ahead.
Subscribe:

“[Sugar-sweetened beverages] are the single largest source of added sugar in the US diet,” they write. “Positive associations between SSB intake and weight gain, risk of diabetes mellitus, and [coronary heart disease] have attracted much scientific interest, but little is known about whether intake of these beverages impacts risk of mortality. However, this may be expected given their associations with the above conditions.”

In addition to the health risks of sugary sodas, though, the researchers also saw that women who drank more artificially sweetened beverages (that is, diet sodas) were still at increased risk for death from cardiovascular disease. They suspect that this relationship reflects people who may already have health problems associated with too much sugar consumption and have switched over to diet sodas.

Related video: Your Brain on Sugar

This research comes at a time when consumption of traditional sugary sodas is already on the decline. Though drinking soda may be the way people in the US get most of their added sugar, it seems that Americans are already wising up. In a 2017 paper in Obesity, researchers found that SSB consumption for both adults and children in the US had gone down between 2003 and 2014.

Taking their place, sales of non-sugary beverages are on the rise. A 2016 beverage industry report showed that seltzer sales had increased by 42 percent over five years, just as anecdotal reports suggest. Walk down any beverage aisle in a grocery store, and beside all the sugary sodas, you’ll see a growing variety of sparkling waters that simply weren’t there a handful of years ago.

Of course, replacing soda with seltzer isn’t just a matter of making a smart choice. Research has established just how addictive sugar is, so for many consumers, it’s not as simple as making the choice to put down the soda. But perhaps this research will help nudge people toward a glass of water instead — and maybe some sparkling water for fun.

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Whether consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) or artificially sweetened beverages (ASBs) is associated with risk of mortality is of public health interest.

METHODS: We examined associations between consumption of SSBs and ASBs with risk of total and cause-specific mortality among 37 716 men from the Health Professional’s Follow-up study (from 1986 to 2014) and 80 647 women from the Nurses’ Health study (from 1980 to 2014) who were free from chronic diseases at baseline. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS: We documented 36 436 deaths (7896 cardiovascular disease [CVD] and 12 380 cancer deaths) during 3 415 564 person-years of follow-up. After adjusting for major diet and lifestyle factors, consumption of SSBs was associated with a higher risk of total mortality; pooled hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) across categories (<1/ mo, 1–4/mo, 2–6/week, 1-<2/d, and ≥2/d) were 1.00 (reference), 1.01 (0.98, 1.04), 1.06 (1.03, 1.09), 1.14 (1.09, 1.19), and 1.21 (1.13, 1.28; P trend <0.0001). The association was observed for CVD mortality (hazard ratio comparing extreme categories was 1.31 [95% confidence interval, 1.15, 1.50], P trend <0.0001) and cancer mortality (1.16 [1.04, 1.29], P trend =0.0004). ASBs were associated with total and CVD mortality in the highest intake category only; pooled hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) across categories were 1.00 (reference), 0.96 (0.93, 0.99), 0.97 (0.95, 1.00), 0.98 (0.94, 1.03), and 1.04 (1.02, 1.12; P trend = 0.01) for total mortality and 1.00 (reference), 0.93 (0.87, 1.00), 0.95 (0.89, 1.00), 1.02 (0.94, 1.12), and 1.13 (1.02, 1.25; P trend = 0.02) for CVD mortality. In cohort-specific analysis, ASBs were associated with mortality in NHS (Nurses’ Health Study) but not in HPFS (Health Professionals Follow-up Study) (P interaction, 0.01). ASBs were not associated with cancer mortality in either cohort.

CONCLUSIONS: Consumption of SSBs was positively associated with mortality primarily through CVD mortality and showed a graded association with dose. The positive association between high intake levels of ASBs and total and CVD mortality observed among women requires further confirmation.

How the sleeping brain decides which memories are worth keeping

Marie Kondo could get down with this.

In the quest to improve memory, humans exercise physically and train mentally, but one fact remains: The brain may simply be built to forget.

New research on mice shows that a specific type of neuron in the brain is fundamentally involved in helping the brain forget memories during that most seductive of sleep periods, rapid eye movement, or REM, sleep.

A New Way of Working Out Takes 5 Minutes and Is as Easy as Breathing

“Maybe they won’t do 30 minutes of aerobic exercise, but perhaps they’ll do 5 minutes of this."

More than 100 million Americans have high blood pressure. Doctors say a mere 30 minutes of daily aerobic exercise can combat the condition, but only about 5 percent of adults meet that minimum. In an effort to meet this challenge, scientists at the annual Experimental Biology Meeting presented preliminary evidence supporting a new way of working out, which they claim is just as good for the heart, body, and brain.

Do collagen supplements work? A scientist splits fact from fiction.

Everything to know about the popular new health regimen.

By Brooke Russell
on
Filed Under Coffee & Food

Collagen products are popping up everywhere. While collagen is probably most well known for its touted skin care benefits, and as a major component of lip enhancers and injections, some celebrities, like Kourtney Kardashian, are suggesting that people drink it. Products derived from collagen are not just in skin creams and dietary supplements but even in pillow covers and clothing. Kardashian is even selling collagen supplements.

Students who prioritize money miss out in 1 major way after graduation

Chasing a big salary could come with a high price. 

In May, millions of college grads who were lucky enough to have job offers faced a choice: Do you take a higher paying job even if it comes with long working hours, or a lower paying job that might even come with a healthy work-life balance? It may be too late for those recent grads to change their minds now, but a team of psychologists can offer advice to the class of 2020: One of these paths has stronger ties to long-term happiness than the other.

With more popularity, essential oils are showing up in an unexpected place

"Essential oils have been around for thousands of years, and it's kind of the wild, wild west out there right now."

If you have a pulse and are living on planet Earth, especially in the United States, you’ve probably heard about essential oils. You may have inhaled them, rubbed them into your skin, or even ingested them. Over the past decade, they have come into the mainstream with the rise of companies like doTERRA, Saje, Plant Therapy, and Young Living. But essential oils — the scented liquid extracted from certain plants using steam or pressure — aren’t new. They’ve been used therapeutically for centuries.