On Tuesday, Disney released the teaser trailer for Christopher Robin, in which the titular character is revisited by his famous bear, Winnie-the-Pooh. The trailer initiated an unexpectedly vicious battle for CGI bear supremacy, as fans of both Pooh and Paddington Bear, who’s also seen recent screen time, raised a very loaded question: Is there room in the movies for two anthropomorphic bears? Were the bears left to their natural devices, ursine biology suggests the fight would be very close.

On Twitter, some fans proposed a UFC-style fight between the Marmalade Monster and the Honey Hercules. Here at Inverse, we don’t shy away from a fight, no matter how fictitious. Therefore, we ask, who would win?

Let’s start with the facts. Paddington, despite living in England, is an Andean spectacled bear (Tremarctos ornatus), native to the mountains of Peru. Winnie-the-Pooh is a different story, as he is famously a toy plush bear invented by A.A. Milne. But Milne named him after a real bear named Winnie who accompanied Canadian soldiers to England during World War I as a morale-booster. Winnie was a female black bear (Ursus americanus), so for our purposes, we’ll consider Pooh a black bear.

Article continues below

The real-life inspiration for Winnie-the-Pooh was a female black bear that was transplanted to London during World War I.

Now for the big question: Which bear would kick the other bear’s ass? Both species are omnivorous, eating mostly fruits and plant material, deriving only a small portion of their diet from animals they kill. Andean spectacled bears occasionally eat rodents and birds but have also been known to kill small cows. Similarly, black bears sometimes kill salmon, baby deer, and baby moose. So as far as ferocity, both bears are pretty evenly matched. But when it comes to weight, an advantage may emerge.

Andean spectacled bears are fairly small, weighing up to 340 pounds. Male black bears can be much bigger, maxing out around 600 pounds in the wild (though rare specimens as heavy as 1,000 pounds have been reported), whereas female black bears are a lot smaller. Even though the real Winnie was female, the character Winnie-the-Pooh presents as masculine, and since captive bears can often far exceed the size of wild bears (depending on the availability of food), he’s probably near the top of that weight range.

That being said, anyone who’s watched him try to fit his chubby tummy through a hole in a tree to forage for honey knows he’s also a little overweight, suggesting that his size advantage may be offset by a speed disadvantage. With that in mind, it’s probably a wash, physically speaking.

Since the IRL versions of Paddington and Pooh are pretty evenly matched when it comes to size and ferocity, we really may have to resort to cuteness to decide the victor. In this sense, a clear winner emerges. Psychology research has suggested that adults and children prefer animals that look more like babies — those with big eyes, round faces, big heads, and recessed chins. Both of the bears have the last three features, but Paddington’s eyes blow Pooh’s out of the water when it comes to the lifelike cuteness that makes him look like an infant. So in terms of cuteness, Paddington is the clear winner.

Of course, animals can’t consent to a prizefight, and to force them into it would be cruel. Plus, even though the black bear’s wild populations are healthy, the Andean spectacled bear is listed as “vulnerable” by the International Union for Conservation of Nature, just one step above “endangered.” Forcing Winnie-the-Pooh into a fight with Paddington, then, would very likely tickle the internet, but ultimately there would be no winners — only losers.

On Monday, scientists revealed the first images of a human inside the world’s newest total body scanner, called EXPLORER. The name is fitting because this scanner really leaves absolutely nothing to the imagination, tracking the way drugs and disease progress through every nook and cranny in the body.

Designed by biomedical engineering professor Simon Cherry, Ph.D., and biophysicist Ramsey Badawi, Ph.D. at University of California, Davis, this scanner produces images that look like a hybrid between a PET scan (which is often used to find tumors) and an X-ray, all in ghostly black and white. But what’s interesting about EXPLORER, which will be officially unveiled at the Radiological Society of North America meeting on November 24th, isn’t that it produces detailed images of tissues or bones. Cherry tells Inverse that it can also create 3D movies showing where certain drugs may end up in the body.

Last week, NASA released an ultra high definition video of the International Space Station, but many people may have trouble experiencing it as it was filmed. It’s not because of space radiation or mystery holes, but because of something far more Earthly.

The video, which was created in partnership with the European Space Agency, shows the crew of the ISS conducting a range of scientific experiments, all in unprecedented 8K. But the video’s uniqueness is also its downfall: Most computer monitors, even the very largest of desktop monitors, aren’t big enough to show 8K video in all its splendor. To put it another way, that’s a resolution of 7,680 pixels wide x 4,320 pixels tall, whereas the typical high-def YouTube video is 1,920 x 1,080 pixels.

Appliances didn’t always make great holiday gifts. Items like vacuums and toaster ovens have been known to infuriate gift recipients on many occasions…but don’t worry, these 12 items are guaranteed to delight. As the cost of a modern, technological kitchen continues to go up, high-end kitchen appliances are becoming more and more acceptable as holiday presents. Which is why we’ve rounded up twelves appliances (that you can purchase easily on Amazon—and have on your doorstep in a pinch, if necessary) that combine everyday convenience with luxurious design and function.

Beatboxing is incredibly fun to do, difficult to master, and if you’re a celebrity, a hidden talent to show off during late-night TV appearances.

Researchers drew back the curtain on the mysterious mechanics of beatboxing recently by asking beatboxers to do an odd gig: to drop their best beats inside an MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) machine. Led by Timothy Greer, a doctoral candidate at the University of Southern California, the group sought to compare the movements of beatboxing to those of speech, and presented their findings this week at the Acoustical Society of America’s 176th Meeting in Victoria, British Columbia.