About 13.8 billion years ago, the universe began as a small, hot super-force that suddenly and rapidly expanded. Atoms formed, spiraling into stars and galaxies, kicking off a process of enlargement that continues today. That was the Big Bang, an origin story most scientists agree on. But what they still debate is what happened before the Big Bang. On Sunday’s season finale of StarTalk, famed physicist Stephen Hawking continued the debate, asserting he knows exactly what preceded the universe.

The answer, he said, is simultaneously simple and incredibly complex: There was nothing.

“Nothing was around before the big, Big Bang,” Hawking told StarTalk host and astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson.

“According to Einstein’s general theory of relativity, space and time together form a space-time continuum or manifold, which is not flat but curved by the matter and energy in it.”

More specifically, Hawking doesn’t believe time existed before the Big Bang. Einstein’s equations predict that at the very beginning of the universe, all matter and energy were compressed into an extremely small point, but these equations do not provide a mathematical link between what happened before or after the Big Bang. Hawking reasons that because the equations cannot explain what happened before the expansion, the universe materialized out of nothing.

Hawking uses a Euclidean approach to quantum gravity, in which ordinary time is replaced by an imaginary time. This way of thinking imagines the space-time continuum as a closed surface with no end; that is, time began at a singular point, but it couldn’t have existed before the Big Bang. He continues:

“In this, ordinary real time is replaced by imaginary time, which behaves like a fourth direction of space. In the Euclidean approach, the history of the universe is imaginary time in a four-dimensional curved surface, like the surface of the Earth, but with two or more dimensions … The Euclidean space-time is a closed surface without end, like the surface of the Earth. One can regard imaginary and real-time as beginning at the South Pole, which is smooth of space-time where normal laws of physics hold. There is nothing south of the South Pole, so there was nothing around before the Big Bang.”

Stephen Hawking says "nothing" existed before the Big Bang.

While Hawking is confident in his theories, scientists still haven’t settled what actually happened before the Big Bang. Other theories include the cyclical model of the Big Bounce — the idea that our universe emerged from a different collapsing universe — and the multiverse theory, which argues that time couldn’t have begun with the Big Bang because it existed in other forms in other universes.

There are many arguments, some of which are more compelling than others. One Georgetown University physicist, Patrick Johnson, Ph.D., is even open to the idea that Star Wars could take place before the Big Bang.

But it’s Hawking’s habit to speak confidently and convincingly about most things — including his belief that A.I. will replace humans, aliens won’t kill us off, and that we need to get the hell off Earth as soon as possible. Whether he’s actually right may be beside the point.

Want more Stephen Hawking? Then watch this video on why he thinks humans “need to leave Earth.”

Photos via Lwp Kommunikacio/Flickr (1, 2), Inverse

When your profession is studying ancient temples and cultural artifacts, you need a toolbox that matches the magnitude of the job. Brushes, buckets, and sieves have long been the foundation of an archaeologist’s work, but today, those essentials are paired with groundbreaking technology to deepen human understanding of our collective past.

As of June, a total of 31 states and the District of Columbia allow for the use of medical marijuana. Pain is the most common reason people say they need cannabis and the vast majority of users say that it helps. However, despite the claims of the many individuals who believe that cannabinoids — the chemicals in marijuana — can ease pain, it’s been difficult for scientists to explain why. Researchers published in JAMA Psychiatry now claim to clarify the discrepancy.

NASA’s Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite, better known as TESS, has one mission: To find exoplanets around the brightest stars near the Earth. In just five months, it’s clear TESS is up to the task. On Tuesday, NASA announced TESS had just identified two potential planets around distant stars and released the first set of images captured by TESS. In the same week, collaborators at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research submitted two papers outlining the evidence for the two planets.

For the first time since its launch in April, NASA’s Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite has sent home images of our stellar neighborhood. TESS captured a series of images with its four wide-field cameras, comprising a full 24°-by-96° section of the southern sky, over 30 minutes on August 7. On Monday, NASA released the images — TESS’s “first light — which show over a dozen stars already known to have transiting planets.

Space might be expanding at a rate of 68 kilometers per second per megaparsec, but that’s still not enough room for us humans to keep filling it with all our trash without consequences.

So far, the U.S. Department of Defense’s Space Surveillance Network has identified around 8,000 human-made pieces of trash that are already casually floating above our heads at this very moment. That could potentially damage operational space technology or even interfere with future missions.