About 13.8 billion years ago, the universe began as a small, hot super-force that suddenly and rapidly expanded. Atoms formed, spiraling into stars and galaxies, kicking off a process of enlargement that continues today. That was the Big Bang, an origin story most scientists agree on. But what they still debate is what happened before the Big Bang. On Sunday’s season finale of StarTalk, famed physicist Stephen Hawking continued the debate, asserting he knows exactly what preceded the universe.

The answer, he said, is simultaneously simple and incredibly complex: There was nothing.

“Nothing was around before the big, Big Bang,” Hawking told StarTalk host and astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson.

“According to Einstein’s general theory of relativity, space and time together form a space-time continuum or manifold, which is not flat but curved by the matter and energy in it.”

More specifically, Hawking doesn’t believe time existed before the Big Bang. Einstein’s equations predict that at the very beginning of the universe, all matter and energy were compressed into an extremely small point, but these equations do not provide a mathematical link between what happened before or after the Big Bang. Hawking reasons that because the equations cannot explain what happened before the expansion, the universe materialized out of nothing.

Article continues below

Hawking uses a Euclidean approach to quantum gravity, in which ordinary time is replaced by an imaginary time. This way of thinking imagines the space-time continuum as a closed surface with no end; that is, time began at a singular point, but it couldn’t have existed before the Big Bang. He continues:

“In this, ordinary real time is replaced by imaginary time, which behaves like a fourth direction of space. In the Euclidean approach, the history of the universe is imaginary time in a four-dimensional curved surface, like the surface of the Earth, but with two or more dimensions … The Euclidean space-time is a closed surface without end, like the surface of the Earth. One can regard imaginary and real-time as beginning at the South Pole, which is smooth of space-time where normal laws of physics hold. There is nothing south of the South Pole, so there was nothing around before the Big Bang.”

Stephen Hawking says "nothing" existed before the Big Bang.

While Hawking is confident in his theories, scientists still haven’t settled what actually happened before the Big Bang. Other theories include the cyclical model of the Big Bounce — the idea that our universe emerged from a different collapsing universe — and the multiverse theory, which argues that time couldn’t have begun with the Big Bang because it existed in other forms in other universes.

There are many arguments, some of which are more compelling than others. One Georgetown University physicist, Patrick Johnson, Ph.D., is even open to the idea that Star Wars could take place before the Big Bang.

But it’s Hawking’s habit to speak confidently and convincingly about most things — including his belief that A.I. will replace humans, aliens won’t kill us off, and that we need to get the hell off Earth as soon as possible. Whether he’s actually right may be beside the point.

Want more Stephen Hawking? Then watch this video on why he thinks humans “need to leave Earth.”

Photos via Lwp Kommunikacio/Flickr (1, 2), Inverse

On Monday, scientists revealed the first images of a human inside the world’s newest total body scanner, called EXPLORER. The name is fitting because this scanner really leaves absolutely nothing to the imagination, tracking the way drugs and disease progress through every nook and cranny in the body.

Designed by biomedical engineering professor Simon Cherry, Ph.D., and biophysicist Ramsey Badawi, Ph.D. at University of California, Davis, this scanner produces images that look like a hybrid between a PET scan (which is often used to find tumors) and an X-ray, all in ghostly black and white. But what’s interesting about EXPLORER, which will be officially unveiled at the Radiological Society of North America meeting on November 24th, isn’t that it produces detailed images of tissues or bones. Cherry tells Inverse that it can also create 3D movies showing where certain drugs may end up in the body.

While we all love sleeping there’s nothing more disgusting that what you’re sleeping in. Your sheets, by all conventional standards, are hosts for thousands of gross bacteria, fungi, sweat and bodily excretions that you sleep in every night. Worst part is that most people don’t wash their sheets nearly enough. While there are some that throw their dirty sheets in the laudry weekly, as recommended, most people can go weeks without it. They are lying in filth on a nightly basis and doing nothing about it.

Richard Branson is aiming to get humans into space even earlier than fellow entrepreneur Elon Musk. The founder of Virgin Galactic said Friday that he’s “pretty confident” he’ll be able to launch astronauts into space before December 25. But even if he is able to put the plan into fruition, the end result still won’t be exactly what you’ve come to expect from SpaceX’s previous uncrewed launches.

SpaceX isn’t shy about showing off its rocket recovery capabilities. Most of Falcon 9’s launches culminate with the first stage booster gracefully touching back down on a drone ship. But what isn’t as well-documented is the three-day-long process of getting the rocket from the ocean back to port and onto land. So hobbyist photographer and space enthusiast Stephen Marr decided to film a time-lapse of the process.

Elon Musk wants to send humans to Mars, and it could happen as soon as 2024. The SpaceX CEO has outlined a plan to get people to the red planet, with bold visions of refueling rockets to “planet hop” and explore the furthest reaches of the solar system.

Many plans for a Mars settlement expect a community in matters of decades. The United Arab Emirates aims for a city of 600,000 by 2117. Astrobiologist Lewis Dartnell told Inverse last month that “while the first human mission to land on Mars will likely take place in the next two decades, it will probably be more like 50-100 years before substantial numbers of people have moved to Mars to live in self-sustaining towns.”