Every October, internet denizens converge to shout into the void — but mostly, at each other — about candy corn. The debate is divided into two warring factions: the fans — or as we at Inverse call them, “Candy Corners” — and those bereft of a happy childhood.

At this point, the ‘net is saturated with candy corn takes for the candy corn god. The common thread among all of them is that the treat evokes a strong sense of nostalgia, which can actually influence a person’s feelings toward food, either positively or negatively. Basically, if a person grew up enjoying the flavor of candy corn — or maybe the setting they ate it in — they’re more likely to indulge in it as an adult.

Some people never acquire this appreciation for such refined things and while it’s not entirely their fault, they don’t deserve our sympathy, either.

We asked food scientists for their input to settle the great candy corn score once and for all. Of course, some of our staff felt compelled to add their own thoughts:

Rich Hartel

Professor of Food Engineering at the University of Wisconsin-Madison

“Why do people either love it or hate it? Who knows why people do or think a lot of things. I used to eat them, but don’t any more. That’s true of most candies — I ate a lot of candy when I was a kid but control what I eat now to maintain some semblance of a decent weight. Candy corn is one of those candies that isn’t good enough for me to waste calories on.”

Gary A. Reineccius

Professor in the Department of Food Science and Nutrition at the University of Minnesota

“There are many foods that people disagree about liking. I do not feel candy corn is different from many other foods. I am indifferent to it. I do not eat it — it is too sweet.”

Peter Hess

Science Writer, Inverse

“I’d just like to say that I think people who hate on candy corn are just trying to be contrarian. There is no empirical support for their position that it is anything but good. Search PubMed for “candy corn bad” and you’ll find nothing. (I assume, I haven’t actually done that.)”

Emma Beckett

Nutrition Scientist at the University of Newcastle, Australia

“I’m Australian. We don’t have candy corn, and it’s spring here. Seasonal candies in general encourage people to over-indulge. If it’s for a limited time only, people are more likely to overdo it. Plus the nostalgia factor enhances the experience.”

Caitlin Busch

Entertainment Writer, Inverse

“Candy corn is bad and when I was about 8, my little cousin decided to pelt me with candy corn a few days after Halloween.”

J. Bruce German

Professor and Chemist in the Department of Food Science and Technology at UC Davis

“I am perhaps alone, but I have no opinion about candy corn.”

Eric Francisco

Pop Culture Writer, Inverse

“My ultimate take is that Candy Corn is a mediocre piece of candy that is neither good nor bad, it’s just there. It is plain and inoffensive, like Coldplay, mini pretzels, or House Democrats. At least with truly bad things — Peeps, PewDiePie, the GOP — we know true evil.”


Soon, you’ll be able to eat twice as much chocolate. Check out this video to find out more.

SpaceX is gearing up to send humans into space for the first time. On Monday, CEO Elon Musk confirmed a report that claimed NASA estimates the firm will be ready for people-carrying space adventures as early as April of next year. While a good sign for the company’s Mars mission, a successful human test flight would also enable a new method of sending people to the International Space Station.

Conspiracy theorists of Brisbane caught a glimpse of the unexplainable on Tuesday morning when a mysterious hole opened up in the cotton-ball clouds blanketing the city. Australian Twitter responded predictably, calling the hole a “portal” for UFOs. There’s no denying that the oblong gap seemed wide enough for aliens to step through, but as atmospheric scientist David A. Kristovich, Ph.D., explains to Inverse, it merely marks the footprint of falling ice.

When you imagine an Egyptian mummy, you probably picture the embalmed body of a pharaoh, carefully wound in long strips of linen and laid in an ornate sarcophagus. But the mummies of an earlier age weren’t laid to rest in such decadence, suggesting to the scientists who found their bodies in shallow pits that they were preserved by chance, sand, and air. This “natural preservation” theory, however, might be laid to rest by a study published Thursday in the Journal of Archeological Science. Prehistoric Egyptian mummies, the authors say, were also treated with care.

In modern society, you can be lazy and not face much consequence. Don’t want to cook? Order Seamless. Don’t want to move? Call a Lyft. But according to a controversial new study, the same could not be said for Homo erectus, an ancient relative of our species. In the study, scientists claim that H. erectus went extinct because it existed in a constant state of meh.

In recent years, we’ve learned that sea level rise will put coastal cities at risk of greater flooding due to storm surges and at risk of flooding without storms. But new research suggests that sea level rise could also increase the danger of tsunami hazards in those cities, even if they were typically immune from the catastrophic waves in the past. One of these cities is Macau, the Las Vegas of Asia, which stands to lose its world-renowned luxury hotels and casinos if climate change continues at its current pace.